Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700T 9,225 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	69% Good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 95.4 2-Core 175 68% 116 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 451 49% 386 Pts	64-Core 451 28% 451 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake) 188,220 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 8169) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1339 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	5.51% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 7.3 Parallax 6.8 5% 6.7 fps	MRender 8.5 Gravity 5.9 Splatting 9.7 7% 8.03 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.51% Great: 6%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40 53,931 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: X41200RL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 434 Write 412 Mixed 332 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 30.7 107% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 297 DQ Mixed 254 214% 312 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 101%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 36GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 2099 Write 1,741 Mixed 1,372 386% 1,737 MB/s	4K Read 45.3 4K Write 85.8 4K Mixed 58.4 189% 63.2 MB/s	DQ Read 722 DQ Write 416 DQ Mixed 631 453% 589 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G43EB1-CRC 2x8GB 98 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.4% Good	MC Read 24.9 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 20.9 68% 23.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 24.1 SC Mixed 20.8 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 66.4% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	404x
HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 3%, 16,316 samples	35x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	15x
KingFast 512GBBench 79%, 3,625 samples	15x
MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 99%, 5,580 samples	14x

RAM
HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 38%, 45,898 samples	21x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	17x
M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 35%, 32,056 samples	17x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28