HP ProDesk 600 G2 DM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ProDesk 600 G2 DM  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8169
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220729
Uptime13.9 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '23 at 13:16
Run Duration102 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 161
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 409
46% 363 Pts
64-Core 463
29% 463 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8169) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1339
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 6.7
5% 6.7 fps
MRender 8.1
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 438
Write 414
Mixed 335
88% 395 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 33.1
110% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 251
212% 311 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 101%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
36GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,118
Write 1730
Mixed 1,402
388% 1,750 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 58.6
190% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 718
DQ Write 415
DQ Mixed 629
452% 588 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G43EB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
68.4% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 21.9
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 19.9
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 600 G2 DM Builds (Compare 445 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 600 G2 DM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback