TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus H110M-K X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-K X  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181130
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '23 at 03:12
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 78.3
1-Core 95.9
2-Core 174
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 337
43% 325 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 66.5%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
MSI(1462 397D)
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 120
Parallax 141
109% 132 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 105
Splatting 89.5
89% 113 fps
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
778GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR045
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 340 376 401 348 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 315
Write 389
Mixed 308
SusWrite 314
75% 331 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 42.3
129% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 160
172% 287 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 88.2%
 Great: 125%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 162 163 167 168 164 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Read 25.5
Write 50
Mixed 37.2
SusWrite 160
50% 68.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 53.1%
 Great: 103%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
170GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 46 47 57 60 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 76.4
Write 51.9
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 50.2
40% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
49% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 36.3%
 Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.6% Very good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.2
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 21
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑
This bench: 70.6%
 Great: 127%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H110M-K X Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K X

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel  $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples11x
Core i5-6500Intel  $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples7x
Core i5-7400Intel  $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples4x
GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples4x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples3x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia  $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples3x
SSD
MX500 1TBCrucial  $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples2x
TS120GSSD220S 120GBTranscendBench 70%, 8,401 samples2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples2x
RAM
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples2x
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 67%, 6,881 samples2x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 74%, 20,415 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback