Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime5 Days
Run DateFeb 07 '23 at 16:53
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 166
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 335
42% 320 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
2.89% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 5.6
4% 4.7 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.1
0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.89%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3E00101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 95 51 52 56 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 201
Write 286
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 93.4
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 10
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 21.2
77% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 29.6
76% 160 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 100%
WD WD3200AVJS-63WDA0 320GB
0GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 50.4
Write 62.4
Mixed 40.9
38% 51.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8213.C8FDD1 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.7% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.7
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 7.9
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 97
41% 97 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 1,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback