MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 353%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 321%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics343% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive245% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C94
MotherboardMSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '23 at 21:30
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 92.3
1-Core 167
2-Core 323
105% 194 Pts
4-Core 660
8-Core 1019
104% 840 Pts
64-Core 1,157
72% 1,157 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
Nvidia(10DE 167C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
343% Outstanding
Lighting 513
Reflection 623
Parallax 724
418% 620 fps
MRender 547
Gravity 570
Splatting 310
373% 476 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 343%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1796 481 223 173 158 236 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1713
Write 2,119
Mixed 1,890
SusWrite 511
351% 1,558 MB/s
4K Read 60.5
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 83.7
292% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,398
DQ Write 1,086
DQ Mixed 1,222
920% 1,235 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 245%
Great: 365%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
101GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 481 478 494 493 384 355 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 475
Mixed 430
SusWrite 448
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 64.4
218% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 374
281% 375 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
576GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 96 96 100 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 157
Write 168
Mixed 95.3
SusWrite 97.1
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1
294% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 105%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
2TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 194 197 193 197 192 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 63% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 46.8
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 42.1
110% 38.7 GB/s
SC Read 32.7
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 43.6
99% 34.5 GB/s
Latency 63.5
63% 63.5 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 108%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94) Builds (Compare 2,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback