MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 358%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 329%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics355% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C94
MotherboardMSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)  (all builds)
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220817
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '23 at 21:17
Run Duration216 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 172
2-Core 329
107% 198 Pts
4-Core 633
8-Core 1,029
102% 831 Pts
64-Core 1,144
71% 1,144 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 105%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,760
Nvidia(10DE 167C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
355% Outstanding
Lighting 530
Reflection 621
Parallax 868
432% 673 fps
MRender 546
Gravity 622
Splatting 323
390% 497 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 355%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1928 515 212 139 228 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,706
Write 2,192
Mixed 1,848
SusWrite 521
353% 1,567 MB/s
4K Read 57.7
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 81.4
285% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,407
DQ Write 1,087
DQ Mixed 1,215
918% 1,236 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 244%
Great: 365%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
101GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 474 475 373 321 230 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 471
Mixed 425
SusWrite 390
101% 447 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 62.8
214% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 371
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 127%
Great: 133%
WD WD80EZAZ-11TDBA0 8TB
576GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 96 95 96 100 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Read 157
Write 172
Mixed 102
SusWrite 97.1
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1
295% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 105%
Toshiba X300 5TB-$125
2TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 178 179 181 179 182 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Read 131
Write 136
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 179
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.2
257% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 47.1
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 42.4
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 32.8
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 43.5
98% 34.3 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 109%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94) Builds (Compare 2,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550M MORTAR (MS-7C94)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $750
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback