Asus G20CB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemAsus G20CB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G20CB
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180316
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '23 at 13:46
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 204
79% 135 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 538
53% 433 Pts
64-Core 592
37% 592 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Asus(1043 871C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80% Very good
Lighting 99.3
Reflection 107
Parallax 98.2
81% 102 fps
MRender 94.2
Gravity 96.7
Splatting 95.1
78% 95.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1111 1412 1554 1748 1730 1726 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
267% Outstanding
Read 2,033
Write 1,913
Mixed 1,762
SusWrite 1,547
408% 1,814 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 87.4
4K Mixed 56.2
193% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 811
DQ Write 595
DQ Mixed 714
530% 707 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 267%
Great: 507%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$145
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 118 118 120 120 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 158
Write 157
Mixed 118
SusWrite 118
102% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.2
297% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 110%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 118 118 120 120 123 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 105
Write 94.1
Mixed 93.4
SusWrite 118
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 86%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$145
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 153 143 155 152 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 154
Write 155
Mixed 111
SusWrite 153
106% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
301% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 110%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
686GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 102 103 101 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
69% Good
Read 139
Write 89.4
Mixed 107
SusWrite 101
81% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69%
Great: 100%
WD easystore 25FB 1TB
596GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 160 166 172 171 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 166
Write 159
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 170
168% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 74%
WD easystore 25FB 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 93 93 93 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 89.3
Write 70.3
Mixed 63
SusWrite 92.1
105% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71% Very good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 20.9
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 20
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G20CB Builds (Compare 996 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: Asus G20CB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $448
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback