HP Z440 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemHP Z440 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 212B
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '23 at 22:21
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 64.5
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 115
46% 77.1 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 283
29% 235 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 95 94 90 95 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.2% Below average
Read 151
Write 142
Mixed 135
SusWrite 93.5
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 9.7
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 13.3
44% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 172
129% 172 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 94%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 89 89 84 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 111
Write 119
Mixed 61.4
SusWrite 87.4
69% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40DB1-CRC M393A1G40DB1-CRC M393A1G40EB1-CRC M393A1G40EB1-CRC 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
52.5% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 19.6
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z440 Workstation Builds (Compare 6,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Z440 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback