Razer Book 13 - RZ09-0357

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics14.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemRazer Book 13 - RZ09-0357  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer MA310
Memory2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211103
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '23 at 23:45
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 57.7
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 134
52% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 375
38% 308 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(1A58 1008) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 23.9
16% 23 fps
MRender 19.4
Gravity 27.3
Splatting 1
12% 15.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-00A00 256GB
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXH7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1233 359 369 376 380 380 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,558
Write 1,468
Mixed 1,064
SusWrite 516
258% 1,152 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 98.2
4K Mixed 58.5
196% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 382
DQ Mixed 479
361% 488 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 177%
Great: 259%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E512M32D2NP 8x1GB
8 of 8 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 54.6
MC Mixed 35.5
119% 41.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 12.9
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Book 13 - RZ09-0357 Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Razer Book 13 - RZ09-0357

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback