MSI B85M-E45(MS-7817)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI B85M-E45(MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '23 at 11:43
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 47
1-Core 20.8
2-Core 71.6
28% 46.5 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 306
34% 269 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
MSI(1462 7817) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.15% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 0
Parallax 0
3% 1.17 fps
MRender 6.8
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.15%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ASU300-480GB 480GB
258GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0219B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 0 32 0 0 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Write 76.8
Mixed 208
SusWrite 16.7
23% 101 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 22.7
4K Mixed 11.3
40% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 69.8
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 23.5
22% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 50%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
139GB free
Firmware: HP35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 82 83 84 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 115
Write 31
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 82.5
54% 73.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.9% Below average
MC Read 12.8
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10
33% 11.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E45(MS-7817) Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI B85M-E45(MS-7817)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback