Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics67.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory3.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime12.1 Days
Run DateJan 30 '23 at 16:01
Run Duration239 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 44.1
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 79.2
34% 56.2 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 251
24% 198 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 67%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.2% Good
Lighting 83.5
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 80
68% 84.8 fps
MRender 95.4
Gravity 78.8
Splatting 71.1
66% 81.8 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 72%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 25.8
15% 19.7 fps
MRender 11.4
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 15.3
13% 16 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20110000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 703
Write 542
Mixed 588
136% 611 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 24.5
4K Mixed 25.7
91% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 80.1
DQ Mixed 130
123% 200 MB/s
Poor: 86% Great: 187%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: LCM2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 116
Write 121
Mixed 80.9
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
176% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 70%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
40GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.6
Write 4.7
Mixed 9.7
14% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.9
60% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 39%
SanDisk USB Flash Drive 16GB
3GB free, PID 557e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.4
Write 10.7
Mixed 13.7
19% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.9
116% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK Kingston 9905700-012.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
68.1% Good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 25.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 16.8
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 184
22% 184 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback