Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

Performance Results


Gaming 49% Yacht	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 43% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	68.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	134% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX505DU
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 30 '23 at 16:35
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H 42,271 User benchmarks, average bench 54% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	62.9% Good	Memory 64.7 1-Core 102 2-Core 181 65% 116 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 530 53% 429 Pts	64-Core 489 30% 489 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 67%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 10AF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.24 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	68.9% Good	Lighting 85.5 Reflection 93.5 Parallax 81.5 70% 86.8 fps	MRender 98.5 Gravity 80.2 Splatting 72.6 67% 83.8 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 68.9% Great: 72%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics 37,264 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 21.8.2 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Lighting 18.7 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 24.9 15% 19.3 fps	MRender 11.6 Gravity 20.8 Splatting 13.9 13% 15.4 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GB 16,774 User benchmarks, average bench 141% 90GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 381 414 319 274 236 217 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	Read 1084 Write 994 Mixed 965 SusWrite 307 188% 837 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 73.3 4K Mixed 48.9 156% 52.8 MB/s	DQ Read 776 DQ Write 254 DQ Mixed 468 358% 499 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 187%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB 3,232 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: LCM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 127 126 127 127 125 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	69.9% Good	Read 118 Write 127 Mixed 81.9 SusWrite 126 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.4 169% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 69.9% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK Kingston 9905700-012.A00G 16GB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	78.7% Very good	MC Read 29.8 MC Write 29.3 MC Mixed 27 82% 28.7 GB/s	SC Read 20.5 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 21.5 68% 23.9 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DU_FX505DU

CPU
Ryzen 7 3750HAMDBench 54%, 42,271 samples	492x
Ryzen 5 3550HAMDBench 53%, 57,853 samples	57x

GPU
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	300x
Radeon RX Vega 10 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 37,264 samples	216x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	32x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	172x
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GBBench 149%, 29,713 samples	149x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 141%, 16,774 samples	53x

RAM
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 42%, 21,753 samples	67x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	54x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	29x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16