Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '23 at 20:22
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Memory 84.7
1-Core 163
2-Core 307
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 561
8-Core 1,079
97% 820 Pts
64-Core 2,127
132% 2,127 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 108%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,619
Write 2,482
Mixed 1,856
516% 2,319 MB/s
4K Read 67
4K Write 160
4K Mixed 91
303% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,270
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 1,064
794% 1,064 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
288GB free
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1820 1334 846 949 494 633 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 324
Write 3,229
Mixed 1,970
SusWrite 1,013
377% 1,634 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 78.9
260% 98.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,533
DQ Write 1,126
DQ Mixed 1,318
988% 1,326 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 215%
Great: 486%
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
352GB free
Firmware: 42AZS6AC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1615 1078 992 990 980 984 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,012
Write 1085
Mixed 955
SusWrite 1,106
287% 1,290 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 52.5
195% 79.5 MB/s
DQ Read 838
DQ Write 888
DQ Mixed 677
560% 801 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 246%
Great: 370%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 162 161 160 155 161 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 38.4
MC Mixed 38.3
114% 40 GB/s
SC Read 29
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 37.5
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 109%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,048 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,714
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback