Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '23 at 20:09
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Memory 86.3 1-Core 162 2-Core 304 100% 184 Pts	4-Core 547 8-Core 945 90% 746 Pts	64-Core 1,135 70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 108%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,582 Write 2,465 Mixed 1,836 511% 2,294 MB/s	4K Read 65.6 4K Write 153 4K Mixed 87 292% 102 MB/s	DQ Read 1,250 DQ Write 882 DQ Mixed 1,061 794% 1,064 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100 46,203 User benchmarks, average bench 317% 288GB free Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1801 944 949 937 955 954 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	273% Outstanding	Read 1872 Write 3,469 Mixed 2,180 SusWrite 1090 488% 2,153 MB/s	4K Read 44.7 4K Write 170 4K Mixed 77.8 257% 97.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,366 DQ Write 932 DQ Mixed 806 694% 1,035 MB/s
Poor: 189% ↑ This bench: 273% Great: 486%
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB 22,361 User benchmarks, average bench 287% 352GB free Firmware: 42AZS6AC SusWrite @10s intervals: 1549 1125 981 987 979 984 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	286% Outstanding	Read 2,240 Write 1,250 Mixed 188 SusWrite 1,101 263% 1,195 MB/s	4K Read 56.4 4K Write 133 4K Mixed 78.2 256% 89.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1255 DQ Write 968 DQ Mixed 674 623% 966 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 286% Great: 370%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121 553 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 162 162 160 161 162 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	93.1% Outstanding	MC Read 39.3 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 36.4 95% 33.1 GB/s	SC Read 28.8 SC Write 23.4 SC Mixed 37.8 86% 30 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 93.1% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,167x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	870x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	869x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	610x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	528x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	489x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	482x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $75Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	314x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	215x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	290x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	158x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	94x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,745

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16