Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER (all builds)
Memory	25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 29 '23 at 20:16
Run Duration	226 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Memory 85.8 1-Core 161 2-Core 285 97% 177 Pts	4-Core 564 8-Core 1,056 97% 810 Pts	64-Core 2,138 132% 2,138 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 108%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,650 Write 2,520 Mixed 1,877 523% 2,349 MB/s	4K Read 68.2 4K Write 155 4K Mixed 90.3 301% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,276 DQ Write 871 DQ Mixed 1,036 783% 1,061 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100 46,203 User benchmarks, average bench 317% 288GB free Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 3071 944 938 886 851 867 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	297% Outstanding	Read 1,972 Write 3,563 Mixed 2,118 SusWrite 1,260 505% 2,228 MB/s	4K Read 46.6 4K Write 172 4K Mixed 79 263% 99.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,558 DQ Write 1,134 DQ Mixed 1,312 990% 1,335 MB/s
Poor: 189% ↑ This bench: 297% Great: 486%
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB 22,361 User benchmarks, average bench 287% 352GB free Firmware: 42AZS6AC SusWrite @10s intervals: 1627 1106 988 987 989 983 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	247% Outstanding	Read 2,035 Write 1,076 Mixed 962 SusWrite 1,113 288% 1,296 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 157 4K Mixed 53.1 198% 80.5 MB/s	DQ Read 839 DQ Write 819 DQ Mixed 676 550% 778 MB/s
Poor: 195% ↑ This bench: 247% Great: 370%
Seagate IronWolf 6TB (2017)-$121 553 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 1.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 159 161 160 161 161 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$102 110,884 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 41.6 MC Write 37.7 MC Mixed 38.5 112% 39.3 GB/s	SC Read 28.9 SC Write 23.3 SC Mixed 38 86% 30.1 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $260Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,167x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $416Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	870x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	869x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	610x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	528x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	489x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	482x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $75Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	314x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $170Bench 416%, 138,083 samples	215x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	290x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GBG.SKILLBench 110%, 12,538 samples	158x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 106%, 11,505 samples	94x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $1,756

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16