Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% AM3R2, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	Memory 84.8 1-Core 55.3 2-Core 113 54% 84.5 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 219 25% 195 Pts	64-Core 214 13% 214 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 62%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
ATI Radeon 3000 Graphics 21,841 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 8388) 256MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	0.88% Terrible	Lighting 1.3 Reflection 1.2 Parallax 0.8 1% 1.1 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 0.4 0% 0.67 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.88% Great: 1%
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Zotac(19DA 288A) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.02 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Lighting 21.3 Reflection 18.1 Parallax 20.7 17% 20 fps	MRender 24.9 Gravity 22.9 Splatting 16.8 17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 2.5 240GB 1,708 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: 42051100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 66 66 60 74 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.5% Below average	Read 155 Write 163 Mixed 159 SusWrite 70.5 31% 137 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 22.1 68% 22 MB/s	DQ Read 25.8 DQ Write 45.5 DQ Mixed 30 24% 33.8 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 77%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 80 82 66 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 105 Write 103 Mixed 68.9 SusWrite 79.6 66% 89 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 85%
Seagate BUP Slim GD 1TB 545 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 166GB free Firmware: 0304 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 99 102 99 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 94.6 Write 70.6 Mixed 56.2 SusWrite 101 59% 80.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.4% Below average	MC Read 10.4 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 9.3 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 9.3 24% 8.23 GB/s	Latency 72.1 56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	139x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	127x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	91x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	85x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	56x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $171

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16