Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 219%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 112%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 28 '23 at 17:12
Run Duration402 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 180
2-Core 356
112% 210 Pts
4-Core 699
8-Core 1,372
122% 1,035 Pts
64-Core 2,897
179% 2,897 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 112%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
Asus(1043 87D1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
165% Outstanding
Lighting 247
Reflection 233
Parallax 202
201% 227 fps
MRender 243
Gravity 178
Splatting 128
144% 183 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 165%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
342GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 893 605 609 605 589 598 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2,514
Write 2,235
Mixed 1,564
SusWrite 650
388% 1,741 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 75.6
267% 95 MB/s
DQ Read 915
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 421
366% 559 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 251%
Great: 340%
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
728GB free
Firmware: EGFM13.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3684 3770 3772 3767 3859 3878 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
454% Outstanding
Read 2,324
Write 2,632
Mixed 2,256
SusWrite 3,788
624% 2,750 MB/s
4K Read 49.7
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 82.1
270% 99.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,130
DQ Write 936
DQ Mixed 1,030
772% 1,032 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 454%
Great: 472%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
1.5TB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 431 432 434 433 432 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 429
Mixed 403
SusWrite 432
99% 442 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 49.1
158% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 196
152% 210 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 106%
Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
238GB free
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 457 458 459 459 459 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 452
Mixed 393
SusWrite 458
102% 453 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 45.8
156% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 219
165% 221 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
238GB free
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 456 457 459 459 458 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 450
Mixed 383
SusWrite 458
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 34.8
4K Write 84.5
4K Mixed 44.7
155% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 219
165% 222 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
Toshiba OCZ RD400 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$70
417GB free
Firmware: 57CZ4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1374 1441 1414 1426 1397 1519 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,374
Write 1,176
Mixed 995
SusWrite 1,428
280% 1,243 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 65
203% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,011
DQ Write 748
DQ Mixed 652
549% 803 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 245%
Great: 242%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 128GB
113GB free, PID a838
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 97.5
Mixed 70.5
112% 89.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.2
80% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3600C18 CMK16GX4M2B3600C18 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 CMK16GX4M2D3600C18 32GB
3600, 3600, 3600, 3600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
131% Outstanding
MC Read 63.8
MC Write 43
MC Mixed 43.6
143% 50.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 42.1
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,447
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback