Gigabyte GA-G5 MD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.65% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G5 MD  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '23 at 05:50
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 60.5
1-Core 141
2-Core 240
79% 147 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 491
55% 432 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 5015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
4.65% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 30
Parallax 5.2
4% 13.4 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 6.7
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.65%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte AG4512G-SI B10 512GB
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM15.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1493 1525 1866 656 305 314 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,508
Write 1,976
Mixed 1,344
SusWrite 1,027
330% 1,463 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 58.2
186% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 911
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 206
229% 412 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 204%
Great: 376%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFS832A.M8FR Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 29.6
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 16.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G5 MD Builds (Compare 820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G5 MD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback