TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8478
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190507
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 18 '23 at 06:07
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 220
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 553
59% 472 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑
This bench: 77.1%
 Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8478) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6223
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.02% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 41.1
Parallax 7.1
5% 18.3 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 6.5
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.73 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 6.02%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
749GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1376 1494 1638 1933 1893 1896 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,382
Write 1,740
Mixed 1,670
SusWrite 1,705
368% 1,624 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 57.1
179% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 563
DQ Mixed 647
484% 646 MB/s
Poor: 239% ↑
This bench: 244%
 Great: 591%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
145GB free
Firmware: RXM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 122 131 129 130 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 74
Write 109
Mixed 70
SusWrite 128
70% 95.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑
This bench: 58.1%
 Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK Kingston 9905624-046.A00G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.5% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 16.2
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 55.5%
 Great: 83%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx Builds (Compare 4,112 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-cx0xxx

CPU
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples2,775x
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples1,196x
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples100x
GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples2,172x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples965x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples755x
SSD
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples346x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples228x
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-128G-1006 128GBWDCBench 121%, 4,055 samples182x
RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 2x4GBSamsungBench 60%, 54,777 samples634x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples308x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 59%, 11,378 samples283x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback