Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	78.5% Very good	Memory 80 1-Core 122 2-Core 202 77% 135 Pts	4-Core 415 8-Core 648 66% 531 Pts	64-Core 774 48% 774 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 842D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6472 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.98% Terrible	Lighting 7.47 Reflection 27.8 Parallax 7.44 6% 14.2 fps	MRender 8.52 Gravity 6.77 Splatting 14.8 9% 10 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.98% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$50 44,050 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 749 Write 316 Mixed 331 102% 466 MB/s	4K Read 16.2 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 18 105% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 438 DQ Write 320 DQ Mixed 296 244% 351 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 193%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK Kingston 9905624-046.A00G 16GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.9% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 15.6 MC Mixed 12.2 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 16.3 SC Mixed 14.6 42% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	260x
Quadro P3200NvidiaBench 55%, 1,890 samples	131x
Quadro P5200NvidiaBench 80%, 527 samples	119x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	122x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $33Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	81x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GBSamsungBench 183%, 2,021 samples	48x

RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	79x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	40x
HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GBHynixBench 82%, 1,927 samples	28x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16