Dell Precision 3510

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision 3510  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0CC27G
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '23 at 07:52
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 78.3
2-Core 142
58% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 344
38% 298 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Dell(1028 06E0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1338
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 6
4% 9.03 fps
MRender 5.1
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 0.3
3% 3.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
256GB 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 347 340 364 402 394 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 330
Write 368
Mixed 303
SusWrite 363
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 25.2
84% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 80.3
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 128
115% 167 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 149%
WD USB Elements Device 250GB
151GB free, PID 6031
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 39 41 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 52.2
Write 37
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 39.1
53% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
58% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.2% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 9.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.7
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 98.3
41% 98.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision 3510 Builds (Compare 630 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Precision 3510

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback