Asus Q87M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics62.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Q87M-E  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '23 at 09:03
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 68.8
1-Core 76.7
2-Core 148
57% 97.7 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 252
31% 236 Pts
64-Core 250
16% 250 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.6% Good
Lighting 79.1
Reflection 96
Parallax 59.8
64% 78.3 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 80.8
Splatting 72.4
59% 71.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 344 400 417 151 180 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 416
Write 378
Mixed 367
SusWrite 293
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 34.2
109% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 275
228% 329 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 123%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
162GB free
Firmware: 1H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 83 86 83 84 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 78.4
Write 80
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 84.7
56% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
152GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 107 121 109 110 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 39.6
Write 72.2
Mixed 73.9
SusWrite 113
56% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.5
162% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HX318C10FK2/8 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
27.1% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 8.2
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q87M-E Builds (Compare 1,242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus Q87M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback