Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics181% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180411
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '23 at 05:41
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 201
60% 109 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 334
42% 321 Pts
64-Core 339
21% 339 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,148
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4945 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
181% Outstanding
Lighting 295
Reflection 411
Parallax 319
240% 341 fps
MRender 274
Gravity 244
Splatting 0.3
123% 173 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 181%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0107
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 173 90 86 29 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 420
Write 368
Mixed 339
SusWrite 123
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 22.2
103% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 1.3
65% 150 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 100%
Samsung 870 1TB
551GB free
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 367 388 444 451 439 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 445
Write 418
Mixed 390
SusWrite 402
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 42.2
133% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 355
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 100%
Great: 120%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB
9GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 3.6 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 54.3
Write 18.5
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.2
20% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Mixed 0
42% 3.75 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 6%
WD Elements 1TB
102GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 87 89 90 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 60.1
Mixed 42.1
SusWrite 88.4
86% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 26.7
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 22.9
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $123
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback