HP h8-1520t

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP h8-1520t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory17.9 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130318
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 12 '23 at 14:55
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 60
1-Core 63
2-Core 163
53% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 337
38% 301 Pts
64-Core 349
22% 349 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
HP(103C 2AD5) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 2.6
3% 2.43 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.1
3% 3.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 321 363 304 309 313 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 348
Write 346
Mixed 120
SusWrite 270
61% 271 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 10.2
4K Mixed 11.4
54% 14.6 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 14.2
DQ Mixed 23.8
41% 87.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 102%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$132
1TB free
Firmware: FP1R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 104 103 107 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 167
Write 174
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 105
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
468% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ST102464BA160B.16F Samsung Samsung 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
27.3% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 9.6
28% 10 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical h8-1520t Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1520t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $312
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback