Lenovo 90RC009KMW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 125%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 90RC009KMW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3716
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210324
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 11 '23 at 20:32
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 71.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 277
86% 161 Pts
4-Core 520
8-Core 862
84% 691 Pts
64-Core 1,280
79% 1,280 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 3906) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 223
Reflection 215
Parallax 204
182% 214 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 156
Splatting 139
132% 165 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 152%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN730 SDBQNTY-1T00-1001 1TB
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1575 787 766 725 772 781 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 1,961
Write 2,300
Mixed 1,825
SusWrite 901
393% 1,747 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 154
4K Mixed 68.8
240% 89.7 MB/s
DQ Read 994
DQ Write 951
DQ Mixed 988
738% 978 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 251%
Great: 332%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
259GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 433 432 434 435 408 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 477
Mixed 362
SusWrite 431
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 49.2
176% 63.7 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 228
207% 315 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 116%
Great: 111%
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$149
106GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,566
Write 1,837
Mixed 1,391
358% 1,598 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 58.4
195% 72.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,077
DQ Write 1,030
DQ Mixed 1,034
782% 1,047 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 276%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165
502GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 480 482 321 162 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 480
Mixed 430
SusWrite 348
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 54.9
187% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 389
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 370
279% 374 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 116%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE KF3200C16D4/8GX Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE 32GB
2400, 3200, 2400, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.3% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 24.3
63% 22 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 24.3
59% 20.6 GB/s
Latency 98.7
40% 98.7 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90RC009KMW Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 127%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 128%
UFO

System: Lenovo 90RC009KMW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback