ECS H110M4-C43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 125%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardECS H110M4-C43  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20171212
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '23 at 07:00
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 599
62% 499 Pts
64-Core 586
36% 586 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
157% Outstanding
Lighting 234
Reflection 215
Parallax 207
191% 219 fps
MRender 200
Gravity 157
Splatting 139
132% 165 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 157%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$68
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P0801A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 351 429 450 447 453 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 440
Write 413
Mixed 393
SusWrite 402
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 36.1
130% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 250
198% 272 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 118%
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84
12GB free
Firmware: Z3311000
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 374
Write 332
Mixed 247
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 82.6
4K Mixed 20.3
102% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 32.9
60% 115 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 71%
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB
105GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 83 81 81 142 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 166
Write 166
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 103
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
204% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
40.5% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 12.5
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M4-C43 Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H110M4-C43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $60
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback