Acer Aspire V5-561PG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V5-561PG  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA50_HW
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit färger,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140115
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateJan 07 '23 at 16:35
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200U-$281
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 58.6
1-Core 51.4
2-Core 83
41% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 132
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0775) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4248
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.81% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 4.3
1% 5.03 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.81%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
388GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3H01103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 252 343 238 327 385 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 390
Write 315
Mixed 315
SusWrite 301
74% 330 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 18.5
81% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 110
119% 201 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 11.8
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 9.2
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V5-561PG Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V5-561PG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $349
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback