HP ZBook 15v G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook 15v G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 847B
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210305
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateJan 07 '23 at 04:10
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Memory 43.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 207
64% 121 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 454
50% 393 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P600
HP(103C 847B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4283
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Lighting 3.3
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 7.4
3% 6.87 fps
MRender 15.3
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 9
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 187 219 217 225 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 395
Write 262
Mixed 312
SusWrite 188
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 38
4K Mixed 22.9
77% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 89.3
DQ Mixed 13.9
46% 104 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 94%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
186GB free
Firmware: SDM1
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 14,154
Mixed 67.5
5,083% 7,111 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 68%
USB3.0 320GB
253GB free
Firmware: 0203
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 35.3
Write 39.2
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 10.9
21% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 64%
ASMT 2115 10TB
7TB free, PID 1151
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 10 11 10 10 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Read 37.1
Write 37.4
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 10.4
38% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
179% 5.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 118%
WD Elements 1TB
564GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 11 10 11 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Read 49.7
Write 39.5
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 10.5
39% 31.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 43%
WD TS72101 External 1TB
862GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.1% Very poor
Read 38.2
Write 38.1
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 10.8
40% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
69% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
24.2% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 8.2
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 5.8
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 186
22% 186 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 15v G5 Builds (Compare 534 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15v G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback