bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel S975XBX2
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20071213
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 06 '23 at 11:43
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon 3060
J3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 63.4
1-Core 20.9
2-Core 22.2
28% 35.5 Pts
4-Core 34.6
8-Core 37.5
5% 36 Pts
64-Core 31.8
2% 31.8 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.84
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.92% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 9
Parallax 3.5
6% 6.43 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 7.5
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.92%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR054
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 41 49 65 74 75 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.5% Below average
Read 163
Write 102
Mixed 118
SusWrite 59.5
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 33.3
4K Mixed 12.7
65% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 98
DQ Write 88.1
DQ Mixed 23.9
37% 70 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
931GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 33 41 40 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 117
Write 43
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 37.4
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 3.7
8% 2.9 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback