Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics61.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 GAMING X
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory20.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191015
Uptime6.4 Days
Run DateJan 06 '23 at 08:31
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900-$1,989
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 1.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 73.6
1-Core 29.4
2-Core 76.7
40% 59.9 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 192
19% 153 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Zotac(19DA 2511) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
61.7% Good
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 66.6
Parallax 155
52% 95.3 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 85.2
Splatting 75.9
80% 101 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 278 349 365 390 396 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 398
Write 410
Mixed 291
SusWrite 337
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 55.9
4K Mixed 29.8
101% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 221
161% 210 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 133%
JAJS600M4TB 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: VD0R4111
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 236 324 337 358 357 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 01BA 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 029E CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 01BA 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
44.1% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 11.5
36% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 93.3
43% 93.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 GAMING X-CF Builds (Compare 12,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 GAMING X - $225

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $788
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback