TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Acer One 14 Z2-485

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer One 14 Z2-485  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer KBL
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200723
Uptime15.1 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 17:23
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4415U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Memory 55.6
1-Core 55.7
2-Core 102
43% 70.9 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 134
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 39.2%
 Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Clevo(1558 7A01) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
2.54% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.7
Parallax 3.2
2% 2.8 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 5.2
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑
This bench: 2.54%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Zebion 128G 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 161 251 225 248 258 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 413
Write 362
Mixed 313
SusWrite 224
74% 328 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 9.9
54% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 18.5
53% 112 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 53%
 Great: 75%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
785GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 86 82 84 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 135
Write 81.4
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 81.1
68% 92.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.5
186% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 62.3%
 Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMB6-5FAA1BAR01B00 0949 V23D4S84GB1G85282666 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.5% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 16.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 48.5%
 Great: 48%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical One 14 Z2-485 Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer One 14 Z2-485

CPU
Pentium 4415UIntelBench 49%, 6,525 samples47x
Core i7-8550UIntelBench 53%, 184,356 samples17x
Core i5-8250UIntelBench 53%, 234,942 samples13x
GPU
HD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 9,913 samples47x
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples42x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples7x
SSD
GP-GSM2NE3256GNTD 256GBGigabyteBench 163%, 10,769 samples5x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples4x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples3x
RAM
CMB6-5FAA1BAR01B00 1x4GBCorsairBench 36%, 51 samples23x
GKE800SO102408-2666A 1x8GBUnknownBench 43%, 449 samples9x
D44G4G8H8SS91JRB22 1x4GBUnknownBench 34%, 20 samples7x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback