Acer One 14 Z2-485

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer One 14 Z2-485  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer KBL
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '22 at 17:46
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 4415U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 65.4
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 106
47% 76.5 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 146
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 143
9% 143 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Clevo(1558 7A01) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
2.83% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 3.2
2% 3 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 6.9
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.83%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Zebion 128G 128GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 167 242 245 333 330 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 386
Write 328
Mixed 248
SusWrite 252
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 8.1
43% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 165
DQ Mixed 18.7
51% 106 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 75%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
828GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 82 84 83 84 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 79.9
Write 76.1
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 83.5
54% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.7
194% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMB6-5FAA1BAR01B00 0949 V23D4S84GB1G85282666 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.7% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 13
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 113
36% 113 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical One 14 Z2-485 Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer One 14 Z2-485

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback