HP Z820 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemHP Z820 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158B
Memory40 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191028
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 04:19
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0
CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 76.1
1-Core 72.4
2-Core 143
58% 97.3 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 425
40% 334 Pts
64-Core 913
56% 913 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.6% Average
Lighting 57
Reflection 74.6
Parallax 51.7
46% 61.1 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 59.6
Splatting 52
47% 57.9 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500P 250GB
230GB free
Firmware: 20RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 233 235 232 232 231 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 452
Write 404
Mixed 298
SusWrite 253
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 37.5
125% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 243
187% 255 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84%
Great: 84%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
18GB free
Firmware: 4B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 473
Write 415
Mixed 364
93% 417 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 35.3
118% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 256
194% 261 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
571GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1592 1590 1474 1192 1182 1165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,556
Write 1,890
Mixed 1,439
SusWrite 1,366
353% 1,563 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 67.6
4K Mixed 49.9
163% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 487
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 415
302% 397 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 214%
Great: 372%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
188GB free
Firmware: 3B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 108 108 109 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 87.3
Write 89.8
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 108
64% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
196% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
430GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 125 124 125 125 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 114
Write 115
Mixed 62
SusWrite 124
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 88%
Toshiba MK3261GS 320GB
13GB free
Firmware: 0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 106 108 109 109 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 98.3
Write 107
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 108
63% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
125% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9JSF25672AZ-1G6M1 Hynix HMT351U7EFR8C-PB 9JSF25672AZ-1G6M1 Hynix HMT351U7EFR8C-PB 9JSF25672AZ-1G6M1 Hynix HMT351U7EFR8C-PB 9JSF25672AZ-1G6M1 Hynix HMT351U7E... 48GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73% Very good
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 26.5
84% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.9
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 88
45% 88 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z820 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,769 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback