Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_TUF505

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505DY_TUF505  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505DY
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200309
Uptime15.3 Days
Run DateJan 04 '23 at 21:24
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Memory 53.9
1-Core 39.9
2-Core 73.5
35% 55.8 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 443
43% 354 Pts
64-Core 484
30% 484 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 17C1) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
11.9% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 20.2
12% 19.7 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 13.5
11% 13.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.9%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
153GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 816 866 440 756 482 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 759
Write 911
Mixed 714
SusWrite 579
167% 741 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 30.5
4K Mixed 27.4
87% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 424
DQ Write 392
DQ Mixed 404
304% 407 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 111%
Great: 181%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
223GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 123 126 121 123 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 74.9
Write 117
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 122
67% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.7
181% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2666 C18 Series Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.6% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 26.1
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 11.8
34% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX505DY_TUF505 Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505DY_TUF505

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback