Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	23.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 84DA
Memory	9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit barev, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200323
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 01 '21 at 13:21
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8300H 167,898 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	82.9% Excellent	Memory 87.9 1-Core 122 2-Core 228 83% 146 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 585 64% 504 Pts	64-Core 570 35% 570 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 82.9% Great: 80%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile) 160,694 User benchmarks, average bench 23% HP(103C 84DA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	23.8% Poor	Lighting 30.1 Reflection 29.8 Parallax 30.2 24% 30 fps	MRender 34.3 Gravity 32.2 Splatting 19.5 22% 28.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 25%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 84DA) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	5.23% Terrible	Lighting 5.5 Reflection 7.5 Parallax 6.3 4% 6.43 fps	MRender 8.7 Gravity 5.7 Splatting 9.6 7% 8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.23% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$33 44,050 User benchmarks, average bench 125% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: AAHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 261 258 241 217 227 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	128% Outstanding	Read 1,228 Write 381 Mixed 380 SusWrite 242 122% 558 MB/s	4K Read 30.4 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 41.1 156% 59.8 MB/s	DQ Read 397 DQ Write 334 DQ Mixed 285 236% 339 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 128% Great: 193%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 102GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 361 426 432 434 421 434 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 476 Write 430 Mixed 414 SusWrite 418 98% 435 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 76.8 4K Mixed 43.9 150% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 349 262% 350 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2666 C18 Series Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	82.6% Excellent	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 31.3 MC Mixed 24.1 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 17.6 SC Write 32.5 SC Mixed 24.1 71% 24.7 GB/s	Latency 69.6 58% 69.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 82.6% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 31%

Sail boat

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,790x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	944x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	1,167x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,140x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	522x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	335x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	234x
TOSHIBA 128GBKbg30zmv128gBench 91%, 3,266 samples	215x

RAM
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	314x
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	304x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples	265x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16