Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper M3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics201% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G1.Sniper M3-CF  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 20:30
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 91.7
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 183
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 469
48% 390 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4975 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
201% Outstanding
Lighting 288
Reflection 300
Parallax 327
235% 305 fps
MRender 350
Gravity 255
Splatting 189
208% 265 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 201%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 297 279 262 246 237 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 462
Write 399
Mixed 327
SusWrite 269
82% 364 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 32.2
108% 37.2 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 283
226% 318 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 124%
Transcend SSD220 240GB-$33
159GB free
Firmware: R0327B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 308 58 117 131 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 462
Write 386
Mixed 343
SusWrite 174
76% 341 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 20.2
94% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 31.5
82% 168 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 93%
Seagate FireCuda SE SSD ZP1000GM30033 1TB
426GB free
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1401 1521 1605 1748 1746 1777 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
224% Outstanding
Read 1,409
Write 1,432
Mixed 1,363
SusWrite 1,633
330% 1,459 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 80.5
4K Mixed 51.7
161% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 478
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 408
300% 398 MB/s
Poor: 224%
This bench: 224%
Great: 510%
WD Purple Surveillance 3TB (2017)-$79
291GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 70 68 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 93.8
Write 88.5
Mixed 46
SusWrite 68.7
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 110%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
615GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 169 167 170 168 169 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 154
Mixed 38
SusWrite 168
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95%
Great: 108%
TS-RDF5 SD Transcend 32GB
25GB free, PID 4000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 36 38 40 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 118
Write 35.7
Mixed 41.3
SusWrite 38.8
66% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.4
205% 4.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-518.A00LF 99U5471-054.A00LF 99U5471-037.A00LF 99U5471-037.A00LF 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
56.3% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 18.8
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 64.7
62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G1.Sniper M3-CF Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G1.Sniper M3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback