PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 86.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus H110M-K (all builds) |
Memory | 6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170330 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Nov 13 '17 at 21:39 |
Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
Run User | TUR-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
78.6%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
|
28.6%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
86.8%
Excellent
|
||||
WD WD30EURS-63SPKY0 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
72.8%
Very good
|
|||
70.9%
Very good
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Micron 8ATF51264AZ-2G1A2 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
67.2%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 1,131x |
Core i5-6400Intel $68Bench 61%, 171,457 samples | 646x |
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 561x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 849x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 477x |
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 369x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $157 |