Asrock A320M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '22 at 13:42
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 6-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 81.4
1-Core 139
2-Core 278
90% 166 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 843
83% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 175
Parallax 164
152% 175 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 141
Splatting 120
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 660
Write 1,516
Mixed 336
189% 837 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 89.5
4K Mixed 46.2
151% 55.1 MB/s
DQ Read 996
DQ Write 811
DQ Mixed 431
451% 746 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 277%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
607GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 448 453 459 461 460 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Read 405
Write 451
Mixed 367
SusWrite 453
95% 419 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 36.1
132% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 208
183% 270 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 102%
MZ-5S71000-0D3 100GB
34GB free
Firmware: VBC3CD3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 188 190 190 190 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 212
Write 143
Mixed 171
SusWrite 189
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 19.7
4K Mixed 20.2
62% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 36.1
DQ Mixed 43.9
40% 63.3 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3134 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
87% Excellent
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 34.2
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 34.6
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 78
51% 78 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 87%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback