Asrock A320M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics121% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '22 at 20:31
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3600 6-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Memory 80.9
1-Core 140
2-Core 270
89% 164 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 833
82% 668 Pts
64-Core 984
61% 984 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Asus(1043 8827) ≥ 4GB; RTX 3060 TI Asus Tuf Gaming OC
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
121% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 156
Parallax 139
136% 154 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 120
Splatting 109
107% 135 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 121%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 597
Write 1,483
Mixed 688
209% 922 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 50.1
163% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,172
DQ Write 719
DQ Mixed 598
539% 830 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 277%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
621GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 444 457 469 470 471 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 392
Write 443
Mixed 375
SusWrite 458
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 28.9
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 35.2
129% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 208
184% 271 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 102%
MZ-5S71000-0D3 100GB
34GB free
Firmware: VBC3CD3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 187 190 189 187 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
43% Average
Read 219
Write 142
Mixed 134
SusWrite 189
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 19.9
62% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 34.2
DQ Mixed 47.9
42% 64.4 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3134 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 36
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 34.4
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 23.2
SC Mixed 34.6
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M Pro4 Builds (Compare 180 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback