MSI MS-14J1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star Modern 14 C12M
MotherboardMSI MS-14J1  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220929
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 29 '22 at 10:06
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 70.5
1-Core 169
2-Core 324
99% 188 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 797
80% 653 Pts
64-Core 1,020
63% 1,020 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
MSI(1462 134E) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3222
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 24.9
Parallax 24
18% 23.5 fps
MRender 22.3
Gravity 27.3
Splatting 1.9
12% 17.2 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1108 76 73 76 78 77 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,747
Write 1,582
Mixed 1,426
SusWrite 248
279% 1,251 MB/s
4K Read 61.6
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 41.6
239% 92.7 MB/s
DQ Read 889
DQ Write 1169
DQ Mixed 866
699% 975 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 201%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 30.5
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 36.5
SC Mixed 23.6
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-14J1 Builds (Compare 131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-14J1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback