Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

Performance Results


Gaming 118% UFO	Desktop 108% UFO	Workstation 101% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 5 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 3 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4 (all builds)
Memory	27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221014
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 28 '22 at 17:49
Run Duration	254 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-12100F-$98 5,882 User benchmarks, average bench 94% LGA1700, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Memory 84.9 1-Core 172 2-Core 342 106% 200 Pts	4-Core 666 8-Core 833 96% 749 Pts	64-Core 831 51% 831 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$420 390,908 User benchmarks, average bench 129% MSI(1462 C972) CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 4237 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.37 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (144 fps cap detected)	112% Outstanding	Lighting 144 Reflection 144 Parallax 144 117% 144 fps	MRender 144 Gravity 141 Splatting 121 109% 135 fps
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 138%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$138 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 307GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 475 480 482 481 480 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 509 Write 479 Mixed 456 SusWrite 472 108% 479 MB/s	4K Read 43.9 4K Write 136 4K Mixed 64.2 221% 81.5 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 344 259% 347 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 133%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$40 56,204 User benchmarks, average bench 226% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2059 436 271 284 233 290 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	290% Outstanding	Read 1,727 Write 2,103 Mixed 1,750 SusWrite 595 347% 1,544 MB/s	4K Read 69.6 4K Write 263 4K Mixed 104 378% 146 MB/s	DQ Read 1,598 DQ Write 1,465 DQ Mixed 1,244 1,012% 1,436 MB/s
Poor: 139% ↑ This bench: 290% Great: 302%
GOODRAM 240GB 8,481 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 50GB free Firmware: SAFM22.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 433 431 427 400 435 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 453 Write 451 Mixed 324 SusWrite 424 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 114 4K Mixed 38.4 155% 60.7 MB/s	DQ Read 265 DQ Write 305 DQ Mixed 168 159% 246 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 102%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 191GB free Firmware: RVT24B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 432 476 480 483 440 280 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 484 Mixed 461 SusWrite 432 106% 470 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 64 222% 81.9 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 323 DQ Mixed 345 260% 349 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 126%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 76GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 110 84 126 128 128 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	63% Good	Read 110 Write 117 Mixed 78.8 SusWrite 110 76% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 183% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 83%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$107 6,566 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 49GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 104 104 103 105 103 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 101 Write 109 Mixed 98.5 SusWrite 90.9 74% 99.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. IRP4000D4V64L18S/8G 4x8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	MC Read 43.6 MC Write 50.6 MC Mixed 43.9 132% 46 GB/s	SC Read 26.7 SC Write 48.6 SC Mixed 36.6 107% 37.3 GB/s	Latency 72 56% 72 ns
Poor: 97% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	57	144	24"	1280 720	AOC2460 G2460

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H670-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 1,273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 128%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

CPU
Core i5-12400FIntel $153Bench 98%, 31,360 samples	242x
Core i5-12600KIntel $227Bench 109%, 57,538 samples	239x
Core i5-12400Intel $183Bench 98%, 10,127 samples	154x

GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $420Bench 129%, 390,908 samples	140x
RTX 3060Nvidia $330Bench 100%, 301,333 samples	131x
RTX 3070Nvidia $530Bench 148%, 562,666 samples	114x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $78Bench 260%, 140,876 samples	67x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $60Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	66x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $80Bench 386%, 206,100 samples	43x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $70Bench 86%, 53,237 samples	42x
Skill Intl F4-3200C16-16GVK 2x16GBGBench 94%, 11,497 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $694

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $309	Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420	Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12600K $227	Nvidia RTX 3060 $340	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $153	Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16