Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H670-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221014
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '22 at 17:18
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-12100F-$98
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Memory 84.9
1-Core 172
2-Core 341
106% 199 Pts
4-Core 629
8-Core 830
93% 730 Pts
64-Core 831
51% 831 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$420
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 4175 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (144 fps cap detected)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 144
Parallax 144
117% 144 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 141
Splatting 121
109% 135 fps
Poor: 118%
This bench: 112%
Great: 138%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$138
469GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 482 487 487 486 486 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 479
Mixed 457
SusWrite 478
108% 480 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 64.7
222% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 343
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 134%
Great: 133%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$40
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,663
Write 2,051
Mixed 1,747
408% 1,820 MB/s
4K Read 69.6
4K Write 263
4K Mixed 104
378% 145 MB/s
DQ Read 1,600
DQ Write 1,471
DQ Mixed 1,245
1,014% 1,438 MB/s
Poor: 139% Great: 302%
GOODRAM 240GB
14GB free
Firmware: SAFM22.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 443
Write 449
Mixed 318
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 38.8
157% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 168
165% 261 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 102%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
191GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 483 488 488 434 279 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 483
Mixed 461
SusWrite 435
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 64.2
223% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 344
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 132%
Great: 126%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
76GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 127 128 127 129 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 110
Write 116
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 122
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 83%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$107
67GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 104 103 105 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 106
Write 110
Mixed 104
SusWrite 104
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
137% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Wilk Elektronik S.A. IRP4000D4V64L18S/8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 43.7
MC Write 50.4
MC Mixed 44.6
132% 46.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 47.9
SC Mixed 34.5
104% 36.4 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 97%
This bench: 126%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 24" 1280 720 AOC2460 G2460
Typical PRIME H670-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 1,273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H670-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $694
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $309Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $420Crucial MX500 250GB $31
Intel Core i5-12600K $227Nvidia RTX 3060 $340Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $153Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $830Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $381SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback