Asus B85M-G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics81.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive69.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus B85M-G  (all builds)
Memory17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180323
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 14:45
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 197
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 316
41% 311 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.2% Excellent
Lighting 82
Reflection 132
Parallax 163
67% 125 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 83.7
Splatting 136
109% 134 fps
Poor: 83%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 91%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Revuahn 900G 240GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1001A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 351 47 56 53 48 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 434
Write 382
Mixed 368
SusWrite 141
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 62.2
4K Mixed 25.3
109% 38.7 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 46.3
89% 175 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 92%
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
96GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 131 60 81 60 60 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 429
Write 354
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 112
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 24.2
80% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 1.1
74% 175 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
919GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 134 133 132 132 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
Read 152
Write 130
Mixed 110
SusWrite 132
97% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$70
889GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 100 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 153
Write 131
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 99.7
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B1G73CB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B1G73CB0-CK0 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.3% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 18.6
49% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-G Builds (Compare 5,951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-G - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback