MSI MS-16R5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star GF63 Thin 10UC
MotherboardMSI MS-16R5  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 12:00
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 70.4
1-Core 124
2-Core 236
78% 143 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 599
59% 483 Pts
64-Core 766
47% 766 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
MSI(1462 12F4) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2756
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.9% Below average
Lighting 47.1
Reflection 64.9
Parallax 38.6
38% 50.2 fps
MRender 43.3
Gravity 31.3
Splatting 38.8
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AI1 512GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 104 86 82 86 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 931
Write 927
Mixed 877
SusWrite 85.7
158% 705 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 53.8
180% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 489
DQ Mixed 138
177% 309 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 116%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905744-062.A00G 1x31GB
1 of 2 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.7% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 10.4
35% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 9.2
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16R5 Builds (Compare 4,838 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16R5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback