Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_X1500EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_X1500EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515EA
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220816
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateDec 28 '22 at 10:45
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 160
2-Core 286
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 643
68% 541 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 15CC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Lighting 23.8
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 28.6
19% 26.2 fps
MRender 22.4
Gravity 31.3
Splatting 20.2
20% 24.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 879 1043 983 1249 1313 1307 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,791
Write 436
Mixed 1,087
SusWrite 1,129
246% 1,110 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 76.3
257% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 448
DQ Write 420
DQ Mixed 376
298% 414 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 240%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
72.9% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 20.4
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 17
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_X1500EA Builds (Compare 377 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_X1500EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback