Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '22 at 13:48
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 175
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 464
48% 388 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 333 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.18% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 3.9
3% 3.7 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.9
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.18%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SH920 2.55 512GB
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010CL00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 353 378 391 394 386 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 408
Write 328
Mixed 279
SusWrite 368
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 20.2
70% 25.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 97.7
DQ Mixed 1
15% 33.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
250GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 103 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 108
Write 101
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 103
69% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
55.5% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.8
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 18.2
SC Mixed 17.9
51% 18 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 11,712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback