| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Dell Precision WorkStation T3500 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Dell 09KPNV |
| Memory | 14.8 GB free of 18 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130528 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 23 '22 at 23:22 |
| Run Duration | 147 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W3670
CPU, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
71%
Very good
|
66% 111 Pts
|
50% 403 Pts
|
36% 583 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 1757 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.7%
Average
|
49% 62.9 fps
|
48% 60.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
120GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 193 54 69 93 33 MB/s
|
32.7%
Below average
|
27% 122 MB/s
|
62% 20.7 MB/s
|
26% 36.5 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
271GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 105 104 104 106 103 MB/s
|
55%
Above average
|
66% 89.1 MB/s
|
153% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
SABRENT 512GB
170GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 223 222 224 222 230 MB/s
|
171%
Outstanding
|
294% 219 MB/s
|
1,744% 23.8 MB/s
|
2,222% 28.4 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 18GB
null MHz
8192, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.7%
Poor
|
28% 9.63 GB/s
|
24% 8.3 GB/s
|
54% 73.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision WorkStation T3500 Builds (Compare 3,420 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Dell Precision WorkStation T3500
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon W3530Intel $287Bench 65%, 5,773 samples | 482x |
| Xeon W3550IntelBench 66%, 7,649 samples | 330x |
| Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples | 243x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 174x |
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 157x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 128x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $374 |