Gigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Default string
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 23 '22 at 20:56
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 V4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 79.5
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 178
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 705
63% 530 Pts
64-Core 2,042
126% 2,042 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2602 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
103% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 146
Parallax 132
102% 135 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 141
Splatting 123
104% 128 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 103%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 413 413 393 372 329 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 435
Mixed 322
SusWrite 388
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 34.6
115% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 278
221% 309 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 133%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 12 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
92.7% Outstanding
Read 310
Write 21.4
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 12.7
67% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
340% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 93%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 35GB
30GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 57 57 54 63 49 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 350
Write 313
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 56.9
148% 204 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 1.4
337% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 117%
Great: 139%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 55.9
MC Write 50.5
MC Mixed 41.5
141% 49.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.9
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 121%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD5 WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $410
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback