HP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8053
Memory3.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 19 '22 at 10:37
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
68.3% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 192
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 334
43% 322 Pts
64-Core 368
23% 368 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200
Sapphire(174B A004) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.69% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2
Splatting 2
2% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.69%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV01H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 94 98 91 96 95 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Read 464
Write 440
Mixed 373
SusWrite 123
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 39.9
130% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 337
256% 344 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 122%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
916GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 172 174 176 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 110
Mixed 107
SusWrite 174
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
235% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB M378A5143EB1-CPB M378A5143EB1-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.3% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 15.7
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR Builds (Compare 1,777 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback