HP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8053
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 22 '22 at 09:19
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 107
2-Core 208
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 385
48% 367 Pts
64-Core 389
24% 389 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 200
Sapphire(174B A004) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
1.69% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2
2% 2.23 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2
Splatting 2
2% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.69%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 152 149 148 149 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Read 399
Write 388
Mixed 345
SusWrite 175
73% 327 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 41.6
136% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 320
242% 326 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 122%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 174 174 176 174 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 161
Mixed 110
SusWrite 174
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra Luxe 16GB
6GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 14 13 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 178
Write 42.1
Mixed 23.9
SusWrite 13.1
61% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.7
124% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB M378A5143EB1-CPB M378A5143EB1-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.6% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 11.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 12.5
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR Builds (Compare 1,777 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $198
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback